Fit as I may appear?!!?! Anyway, the point is, this is beginning to be all too familiar. hahaha. I've been maintaining around the same standard la. The results by the way have small flaws. 1stly, the 14min22s for 26 Feb 2005 is actually 5 rounds and not 6. ie. 2km only. 2ndly, the 12min01s for 30 Nov 2005 is actually 12min41s. Hence, it would have constituted a fail too as I needed 12min40s to qualify as a pass. The result for the run for the 2 Mar 2006 is not reflected as it's a fail and the guy who keyed in the result just didn't care about the actual timing. I went to take that test as I assumed I failed the 30 Nov 2005 attempt.
This time around, I will be taking RT seriously again lor. I believe that's the only way for slackers like me to build my fitness level. If taking a true and fair comparison, my fitness level is actually better than in 26 Feb 2005. That would be due to the fitness regime I went through back in Oct - Dec 2005 ba. Ah well.... take things as they come....
This time around, I will be taking RT seriously again lor. I believe that's the only way for slackers like me to build my fitness level. If taking a true and fair comparison, my fitness level is actually better than in 26 Feb 2005. That would be due to the fitness regime I went through back in Oct - Dec 2005 ba. Ah well.... take things as they come....
No comments:
Post a Comment